At four years of age, Richard Wright set fire to his home in a moment of boredom; at five his father deserted the family; by six Richard was - temporarily - an alcoholic. Moved from home to home, from brick tenement to orphanage, a grandmother in Jackson, an aunt in Arkansas he had had, by the age of twelve, only one year's formal education. It was in saloons, railroad yards and streets that he learned the facts about life under white subjection, about fear, hunger and hatred, while his mother's long illness taught him about suffering. The same alertness and independence that made him the 'bad boy' of his family and the victim of endless beatings and remonstrance's, lost him numerous jobs. Gradually he learned to play Jim Crow in order to survive in a world of white hostility, secretly satisfying his craving for books and knowledge until the time came when he could follow his dream of justice and opportunity in the north.

The Routledge Handbook of European Sociology explores the main aspects of the work and scholarship of European sociologists during the last sixty years (1950-2010), a period that has shaped the methods and identity of the sociological craft. European social theory has produced a vast constellation of theoretical landscapes with a far reaching impact. At the same time there has been diversity and fragmentation, the influence of American sociology, and the effect of social practice and transformations. The guiding question is: does European Sociology really exist today, and if the answer is positive, what does this really mean? Divided into four parts, the Handbook investigates: intellectual and institutional settings regional variations thematic variations European concerns. The Handbook will provides a set of state-of-the-art accounts that break new ground, each contribution teasing out the distinctively European features of the sociological theme it explores. It will be of interest to students and scholars across the social sciences and humanities.

projects, and an extensive bibliography. --Book Jacket.

While in the ICU with a near-fatal case of pneumonia, Brett Walker was asked, �Do you have a family history of illness?��a standard and deceptively simple question that for Walker, a professional historian, took on additional meaning and spurred him to investigate his family�s medical past. In this deeply personal narrative, he constructs a history of his body to understand his diagnosis with a serious immunological disorder, weaving together his dying grandfather�s sneaking a cigarette in a shed on the family�s Montana farm, blood fractionation experiments in Europe during World War II, and nineteenth-century cholera outbreaks that ravaged small American towns as his ancestors were making their way west. A Family History of Illness is a gritty historical memoir that examines the body�s immune system and microbial composition as well as the biological and cultural origins of memory and history, offering a startling, fresh way to view the role of history in understanding our physical selves. In his own search, Walker soon realizes that this broader scope is more valuable than a strictly medical family history. He finds that family legacies shape us both physically and symbolically, forming the root of our identity and values, and he urges us to renew our interest in the past or risk misunderstanding ourselves and the world around us.

Community is an evolving and complex concept that historians have applied to localities, counties, and the South as a whole in order to ground larger issues in the day-to-day lives of all segments of society. These social networks sometimes unite and sometimes divide people, they can mirror or transcend political boundaries, and they may exist solely within the cultures of like-minded people. This volume explores the nature of southern communities during the long nineteenth century. The contributors build on the work of scholars who have allowed us to see community not simply as a place but instead as an idea in a constant state of definition and redefinition. They reaffirm that there never has been a singular southern community. As editors Steven E. Nash and Bruce E. Stewart reveal, southerners have constructed an array of communities across the region and beyond. Nor do the contributors idealize these communities. Far from being places of cooperation and harmony, southern communities were often rife with competition and discord. Indeed, conflict has constituted a vital part of southern communal development. Taken together, the essays in this volume remind us how community-focused studies can bring us closer to answering those questions posed to Quentin Compson in Absalom, Absalom!: “Tell [us] about the South. What’s it like there. What do they do there. Why do they live there. Why do they live at all.”

Written by the leading authority in the field, the Eighth Edition of this classic text has been rewritten and updated to reflect current and emerging theory, research, and scholarship in the fields of ethnic studies and multicultural education. Divided into five parts, Teaching Strategies for Ethnic Studies emphasizes that the main goal of the multicultural curriculum should be to help students develop the ability to make reflective decisions so that they can, through thoughtful action, influence their personal, social, and civic worlds and help make them more democratic and just.

Blake describes the racial segregation found not only between people within his society, but in children as well. He specifically focuses on two young boys. The use of ‘black’ and ‘white’ directly links to the physical differences between the two boys, and the fact that these colours are considered polar opposites perhaps suggest or emphasises how different the two boys’ childhoods were. It suggests that they are not only different in appearance but in how they live their life and perceive things. For example, we can clearly see that the black boy makes all the positive gestures; he is genuinely good and seeks to protect the white boy, ‘I’ll shade him from the heat’. The black boy seems to be spiritually superior in comparison with the white boy; however, in terms of society it appears that the black boy is in servitude. Blake may be hinting towards slavery. Traditionally, ‘white’ was associated with good whereas ‘black’ was associated with evil – this was prevalent during Blake’s society, a time when the slave trade had yet to be abolished. It seems that the black boy has had a difficult and hard life, and it is only because of his mother’s consolation that he sees things in a more positive light. Even though it seems he does not have his father, he still has his mother, which suggests that he did not have an entirely lonely childhood. His mother ‘taught [him] underneath a tree’ showing she upholds a responsibility towards her son. He receives warmth and love from his mother, yet in the last line of the last stanza, ‘he will then love me’ suggest that he wants a companion or friend that is more along his own age. Children are known to be innocent, and the fact that society’s prejudice prevents these different raced children from interacting is terrible and almost unfair to them. Only upon death it seems, that these two children can be able to find common ground or common humanity, which is denied by the slave system. ♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
The poem has a real political intent – conventional attitudes determined by the fact that we were a colonial society: domination, greed done under civilised, educated men. Slavery was the foundation in which rich society existed on. That and industrialisation. Blake questioning the financial structure that gave that extra quality to the industrial sector 1790 –a huge debate over slavery, at first the little back boy seems to accept the superiority of the white boy. But the last line provides us a great deal to think about if the black boy has rights, in the scheme of things. There is even the implications that the black boy has better chance or is more worthy of being in the presence of god There is a lot of irony here, questioning contemporary people, this poem may have provoked anger from some people Form of the poem: is unusual since usually the lines are short, direct, and cynical BUT this poem is different as it is much longer lines and has quite a regular rhythm – iambic pentameter. It is quite a heightened line. The form here projects a strong message he chooses to give this poem significance. Poignant and moving poem, argument of politics furthered by church – instead of siding with people’s beliefs and rights, hypocrisy in regard to the care of the church not treating people as human beings – instead it seemed they treated society according to the type of person you were according to social class
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
Words that carry arguments: In the end, Blake talks about the relationship between whites and blacks. VOICE: Child’s voice us used an create a bigger impact on the significance of the poem. Using a child’s voice was an important aspect of the Romantics but Blake was talented in the way he would capture and use the child’s voice Focused on mother, retrospective as the little black boy reminiscences of his mother’s love and her teachings, then in the last two stanzas, we are back with the boy speaking. Black and white – they co-exist, they are contraries. The poem is full of double meanings as they can be interpreted in two different ways. The love of the Christian teachings – bad body, good soul – they have separated these two entities. Doubling here seems appropriate due to the contraries that are separated in society. Doubling in the sense of two voices – hearing the individual child speak for different set of race, in stanza one it portrays a very conventional symbolism – black = evil, white = pure. He makes us think very hard of this false separation on ethnicity. Look at the portrait of education: Rousseau  Blake agreed with him all about liberalisation and encouraging children to learn through creativity. Other poems shows strict, harsh and very repressed teaching methods – they had that expectation of children being naughty. Interesting theory about the Little Black Boy is that he is not conventional educations yet he has a good insight. The mother could be ameliorating the boy’s feelings – she does not condemn. There is lots to say about natural education and differs in different ethnic groups with different backgrounds